Gmail 5 Second Delay

Google’s Gmail team really needs to get a handle on this whole naming thing, as in not naming a new feature something that it really doesn’t do. Zoli sums it up nicely.

First of all, I love Gmail, it’s my one-and-only email system. And I’m certainly glad to see the ever accelerating rate of enhancements, whether “official” or just the Labs variety. But oh, please, can we have some control here and call features what they really are?

[From Gmail’s Undo Send Isn’t Really Undo, Just Like Multiple Inboxes Were Not Really Multiple Inboxes | Zoli’s Blog]

I was so massively disappointed that the much heralded multiple inbox extension actually doesn’t present multiple inboxes but rather multiple panes each with the same inbox content that is tagged with a different label.

Similarly, undo send doesn’t recall a sent message but rather inserts a 5 second delay between the “send” button and actually sending a message so it’s not undoing a send, it’s delaying the send. They would have been more accurate to just call it the “5 second delay” extension.

Sirius, Hot or Not?

With the merger of XM and Sirius complete, this might as just be about satellite radio as opposed to simply a company.

It’s no secret that Sirius XM’s business has been hurting. Its recent brush with bankruptcy merely highlighted the huge obstacles the company faced from the beginning: massive capital outlay on satellite infrastructure, and huge spending to attract subscribers.

[From Sirius Founder Says The Company Is Screwed | Techdirt]

The technology industry is awash in roadkill who’s business depended on massive capital investment, significant customer adoption costs, and an entrenched legacy industry prone to technology disruption from unpredictable sources. Webvan, Amp’d Mobile, DeNovis,,, Procket, and Iridium are all examples of technology driven companies that required huge capital investments and blew up because customers were not there, the business model didn’t work, or some orthogonal technology development made them obsolete.

On that last point Iridium comes immediately to mind and in many ways is most like Sirius. Enormous capital investments to operate a service that has hard economics, a fickle marketplace, and ultimately undone by the march of cheap cellular technology which made them obsolete for the broader market before they could achieve critical mass.

Having said that, I don’t agree with Longino’s assessment that internet radio is knee capping Sirius; it is more accurate to explain their demise as a consequence of the global slowdown in new car sales, which is where their customers are coming from.

I have Sirius in 3 cars and XM in our home, satellite radio is fantastic and really eclipses anything Internet radio offers by a wide margin, both in the convenience and quality of service. I am constantly frustrated by Sirius’ approach to online streaming, which requires an additional $3 a month subscription on top of a rate plan that has jumped in price by a significant percentage, and most damning is that the online streaming channel lineup does not map completely to the satellite radio offerings. I can get CNN (channel 132) via Sirius online streaming but Fox News (channel 131) is not available online.

The mobile offerings have been pretty weak and the recently released iPhone software app is a step in the right direction but it relies on the streaming service, which means you have to sign up for the additional $3 a month and you won’t get all of the satellite channels on your iPhone.

What Sirius should do, IMO, is offer an all you can eat pricing plan that covers satellite and online streaming, close the gap on the channel lineup (which no doubt is driven more by the content owners than Sirius), and lastly, invest heavily in the non-satellite business with better mobile devices and a full range of rich mobile applications that install on iPhone, Bold, Android, and Windows Mobile offerings. Customer don’t care that it’s satellite radio, what they are buying is always on high quality content that is available anywhere and Sirius should take the challenge to become an integral entertainment provider to their customers whether they are in their car, home, office, or just walking around town.

Just like I’m willing to pay for an iTunes download instead of searching for a free download, I am willing to pay for online streaming coupled with my existing satellite radio but it has to be convenient and full service rather than the piecemeal approach that they are taking now.

IMDb’s vision: Offer streaming for every title

You kinda have to wonder why this took so long given the obvious fit in terms of strategy. They have a huge audience, already offer a rich media experience, and owned by Amazon which gives them not only marketplace weight but also a streaming download service to deliver this service component through. Lastly, at some point the Kindle will do video…

IMDb founder Col Needham said the massively popular movie database has set as its major goal for the future to add one-button streaming for all of the 1.3 million titles it indexes.

[From IMDb’s vision: Offer streaming for every title | Digital Media – CNET News]

More on this topic (What's this?)
AMZN Kindles New Controversy
Raised stakes for the Kindle 2
Amazon: Sales Ranks for Trend Following
Jeff Bezos on the Moral Hazard
Read more on at Wikinvest