Reiser Really Did Do It

Hans Reiser, creator of the open source ReiserFS file system, was convicted of murdering his wife back in April despite having not recovered the victim’s body. They have it now.

This trial was a pretty big deal here because of the tech connection (the comments on Slashdot following the guilty verdict were mildly amusing at times, mostly disturbing for their ability to reveal how misguided and cynical many people are) and the fact that Reiser himself is an arrogant prick who pretty much hated everyone and the world returned the favor. Lot’s of television coverage and I’d bet that fewer than 1% thought the guy didn’t do it… clearly the jury unanimously thought he did and they were right.

Convicted killer Hans Reiser led police Monday to what he said was the body of his wife in the Oakland hills, just two days before he was to be sentenced for first-degree murder, authorities said.

[From Reiser reveals body's location in exchange for lighter sentence]

More on this topic (What's this?)
Loving the New WordPress!
At IBM, Open Standards matter more than open source
Read more on Open Source at Wikinvest

Gulfstream Liberals

Gordon Brown and his fellow world leaders have sparked outrage after it was disclosed they enjoyed a six-course lunch followed by an eight-course dinner at the G8 summit where the global food crisis tops the agenda.

[From G8 summit: Gordon Brown has eight-course dinner before food crisis talks - Telegraph]

Britain’s PM Brown has another moment in the sun… personally, I think being a world leader gives you a lot of perks and fine food and wine just goes with the beat, but he should keep his pie hole shut instead of lecturing the rest of us about “unnecessary demand” and wasted food. The only thing shocking about these stories is that they apparently come as a surprise to the people at the center of them.

While I do enjoy watching PM Brown and others like him hoisted up by his petard, it is a shame that the very real issue of global hunger as a consequence of poverty gets pushed aside in the process.

I’ll say it again: I will start acting like there is a crisis when people who are telling me there is a crisis start acting like there is a crisis.

How the fuck can you eat 18 dishes over 8 courses and 5 different wines just for dinner… after having finished a six course lunch?

Then the other do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do tidbit in this report details the transportation to the G8 Summit that PM Brown indulged in… entourage and security, okay a charter plane is a requirement but hey doesn’t Great Britain have any charter planes that will work?

He arrived on a plane chartered from Texas, America, which had to fly empty for thousands of miles to pick up the Prime Minister and his entourage.

Playing the Futures Market

200807071218.jpgMyGallons.com is a futures service for fuel that is open to everyday consumers that is part really interesting and part scary. Interesting because it gives financial mechanisms to consumes and offers the promise of real savings at the pump, but the scary part is that average consumers are ill-equipped to manage the process that the service dictates and it could end up costing them more over the long run.

I define this as a “futures” service but only because you are locking in a price by pre-purchasing gasoline and storing the value of that fuel in a debit card. This is not a futures market where you are buying a contract for future delivering and then trading it, you are actually taking delivery of fuel in increments.

For small businesses or fleet operators this could make real financial sense but for the average consumer I can’t see how this would add up to big savings in light of the fees that you are obligated to cover as part of the network. These fees include:

  1. $29.95-39.95 sign up fee
  2. $1.95 fee every time you reload your account
  3. $15 overdraft fee when your account goes negative

There are additional adjustments on the price you are paying based on taxes and the grade of fuel you are buying at the pump. You pre-purchase regular unleaded gasoline and the price is adjusted if you fill up with premium unleaded, or diesel (which is not gasoline at all).

I’ve looked at this pretty carefully and I’m not quite sure how the pre-purchase price is calculated. I think they are taking an average across a range of prices in your home zip code and then using the actual pump price at the point of sale, but then there is a single sentence in the FAQ that left me wondering.

For example, if you live in CA and traveled to NJ where gas is about 50 cents a gallon less, you will earn a credit of 50 cents per gallon. It works in reverse if you use the card where gas is priced higher than your home area.

So after reading the FAQ I am left wonder how this service really works. They are almost too clever and that makes the service difficult to understand, and the website certainly doesn’t help in this regard, if anything their website left so many questions unanswered that I would be inclined to not sign up for that reason alone. For fleet operators this could make sense, but there is a provision in the terms that precludes fleet operators from using this, specifically requiring that only a vehicle “you drive” is eligible, plus they will give you a limit of 3 additional cards.

For this to work for consumers the bar is steep. First and foremost, you have to consume enough fuel to make the incremental cost savings exceed the fees you are paying, and because the savings you can achieve are a function of the time between when you load the card and then use it, well you have to pre-purchase a hell of a lot of fuel to get to the point where the price differential naturally widens.

Lastly, you really have to actively manage this by loading the card when gasoline prices dip and always knowing where you are, plus you are betting that fuel prices will continue to climb and while that has been a safe bet for the last year it is not entirely a certainty going into the future. It seems to me that a more certain method to hedging rising fuel costs would be to offset rising fuel costs by playing the volatility of oil stocks, which trade in a pretty constant range and with predictable swings.