<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Customers Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:48:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Brill</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-243531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/#comment-243531</guid>
		<description>@Rod, this is definitely something to watch for.  

A community of IBM Lotus&#039;s business partners built a really cool site at http://ideajam.net .  Very active, good ideas being generated and discussed.  Some of the product groups at Lotus are engaged, some are not.  But the main issue is, with a product as big and as mass-market as Lotus Notes, IBM can&#039;t even take a tenth of of these ideas and execute on them.  I am definitely concerned about mis-set expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rod, this is definitely something to watch for.  </p>
<p>A community of IBM Lotus&#8217;s business partners built a really cool site at <a href="http://ideajam.net" rel="nofollow">http://ideajam.net</a> .  Very active, good ideas being generated and discussed.  Some of the product groups at Lotus are engaged, some are not.  But the main issue is, with a product as big and as mass-market as Lotus Notes, IBM can&#8217;t even take a tenth of of these ideas and execute on them.  I am definitely concerned about mis-set expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-243316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 06:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/#comment-243316</guid>
		<description>I generally believe that all of these systems are gimmicks unless the company quickly turns around ideas to actions and does it in a transparent manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally believe that all of these systems are gimmicks unless the company quickly turns around ideas to actions and does it in a transparent manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod St. Halpin</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-243203</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod St. Halpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/#comment-243203</guid>
		<description>What do you think about tools like this potentially creating inflated expecations with customers in terms of response?  Creating an easy way for customers to voice their opinions is one thing (I guess the CRM app is already proving buggy); getting an F500 company to implement them is another.  Never mind the case where you get conflicting customer requests or ridiculous demands.  

I&#039;m leaning towards more is always better in terms of providing customers channels to communicate and addressing issues directly before they emerge on third-party blogs.  But sounds like it could get tricky fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about tools like this potentially creating inflated expecations with customers in terms of response?  Creating an easy way for customers to voice their opinions is one thing (I guess the CRM app is already proving buggy); getting an F500 company to implement them is another.  Never mind the case where you get conflicting customer requests or ridiculous demands.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m leaning towards more is always better in terms of providing customers channels to communicate and addressing issues directly before they emerge on third-party blogs.  But sounds like it could get tricky fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-242852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/#comment-242852</guid>
		<description>duh, I coulda looked at the domain name as well!

Oh well, at least I did guess correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>duh, I coulda looked at the domain name as well!</p>
<p>Oh well, at least I did guess correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshu</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-242846</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/03/19/when-customers-vote/#comment-242846</guid>
		<description>Neat little site powered by a powerful SaaS Platform. (There is a logo on the bottom of the page on the site.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat little site powered by a powerful SaaS Platform. (There is a logo on the bottom of the page on the site.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
