<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Health Care Plan Rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:50:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: People Power Granny</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-221264</link>
		<dc:creator>People Power Granny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/#comment-221264</guid>
		<description>Check out peoplepowergranny.blogspot.com and read how I understand each candidate&#039;s position on health care reform in the USA. Would love your opinion and invite you to vote in my poll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out peoplepowergranny.blogspot.com and read how I understand each candidate&#8217;s position on health care reform in the USA. Would love your opinion and invite you to vote in my poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-219953</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/#comment-219953</guid>
		<description>Nationalized healthcare is failing in both Canada and Britain, why any sane and rational person would suggest that this is the answer for the U.S. is a complete mystery to me. 

Your suggestions are all on point, but problem with compromises in our current political environment is that the powers that be simply won&#039;t give anything up even if it means getting something more valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nationalized healthcare is failing in both Canada and Britain, why any sane and rational person would suggest that this is the answer for the U.S. is a complete mystery to me. </p>
<p>Your suggestions are all on point, but problem with compromises in our current political environment is that the powers that be simply won&#8217;t give anything up even if it means getting something more valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/comment-page-1/#comment-219924</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/01/28/schwarzeneggers-health-care-plan-rejected/#comment-219924</guid>
		<description>We need big compromises from everyone.  

First, trial lawyers need to accept tort reform (I recall the NYT times editorial asserting this past year that trial costs are &quot;less than 5% of health care costs&quot; - First, that&#039;s a really big number.  Second, I think they ignored the cost of settlements, spiraling malpractice insurance and defensive medicine).  

Second, insurance companies need to reduce admin costs (I heard you can get a masters degree in how to fill out insurance forms; ever see all the different forms at a doc&#039;s office?) - give them one year to come up with a single form for doctors to use (they should all be looking at the same set of diseases and treatments out there so shouldn&#039;t be hard).  Moreover, better regulations regarding how and when they deny coverage (e.g. if it&#039;s a preexisting condition issue, let my current insurance battle it out with my prior insurer, not me). I shouldn&#039;t need a trial lawyer to get the coverage I paid for.  Also, we&#039;ll need rock solid regulations regarding privacy to avoid people becoming uninsurable based on unauthorized release private medical info.

Third, customers should have co-pays and incentives to take care of themselves. No one should have an &quot;all you can eat&quot; buffet-style care.  For example, unions shouldn’t shut down a factory because they refuse to pay any health care costs (We should eradicate the &quot;slippery slope&quot; argument from both sides – it’s the last resort of a party unable to agree on what is otherwise a reasonable compromise). 

Forth, doctors/health, they need to implement current information technologies.

There is no doubt a lot more we can do, but I feel we haven&#039;t given our private health care system a fair chance.  If implementing these types of changes fails to work, we should then consider something like national health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need big compromises from everyone.  </p>
<p>First, trial lawyers need to accept tort reform (I recall the NYT times editorial asserting this past year that trial costs are &#8220;less than 5% of health care costs&#8221; &#8211; First, that&#8217;s a really big number.  Second, I think they ignored the cost of settlements, spiraling malpractice insurance and defensive medicine).  </p>
<p>Second, insurance companies need to reduce admin costs (I heard you can get a masters degree in how to fill out insurance forms; ever see all the different forms at a doc&#8217;s office?) &#8211; give them one year to come up with a single form for doctors to use (they should all be looking at the same set of diseases and treatments out there so shouldn&#8217;t be hard).  Moreover, better regulations regarding how and when they deny coverage (e.g. if it&#8217;s a preexisting condition issue, let my current insurance battle it out with my prior insurer, not me). I shouldn&#8217;t need a trial lawyer to get the coverage I paid for.  Also, we&#8217;ll need rock solid regulations regarding privacy to avoid people becoming uninsurable based on unauthorized release private medical info.</p>
<p>Third, customers should have co-pays and incentives to take care of themselves. No one should have an &#8220;all you can eat&#8221; buffet-style care.  For example, unions shouldn’t shut down a factory because they refuse to pay any health care costs (We should eradicate the &#8220;slippery slope&#8221; argument from both sides – it’s the last resort of a party unable to agree on what is otherwise a reasonable compromise). </p>
<p>Forth, doctors/health, they need to implement current information technologies.</p>
<p>There is no doubt a lot more we can do, but I feel we haven&#8217;t given our private health care system a fair chance.  If implementing these types of changes fails to work, we should then consider something like national health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
