Gmail Hiccups

Ever since Google turned on IMAP in Gmail I have noticed some general service weirdness that is not easily explained:

1) Performance has swung from great to unusable in the online version. Today it’s moderately slow.

2) IMAP with Apple Mail is generally reliable but unreliable with enough frequency to make me cross my fingers when I open it. I’ve had to rebuild my mailbox twice in the last month in an attempt to right things.

3) Performance in IMAP is terrible, I am right now downloading messages into my inbox at a data rate of between 25-190k. It is also wanting to download far more messages than are in my inbox and folders, which I presume means it is downloading spam messages as well. Were it not for the fact that POP ain’t great in Gmail either, I’d go back to that.

4) For reasons I cannot explain, Google Groups has been having hiccups delivering messages to me. A couple of weeks ago I received this automatic message from Groups: “Over the past several days, Google Groups has had difficulty delivering messages to your email address (jnolan@gmail.com). We’re sending this message to see if your email address is once again accepting mail.”. Which indeed was something I noticed because groups I subscribe to we not generating their usual message traffic but I could see the messages in the Groups web interface.

Am I alone? Anyone else noticing problems with Gmail?

Your Income and Your House

(added first two paragraphs as an update to the post) As if we need any more examples of why you should be very skeptical of what you read these days, take the jump over to Felix Salmon’s fisking of the an opinion piece that should never have been published in the SF Chronicle recently.

The whole piece suffers from an acute case of conspiracytheoryitis, shot through with some very damaging misunderstandings about where legal liability lies in the securitization process. It’s the kind of thing which would be easily ignorable on a blog somewhere, and I’m not surprised that something along these lines has been written. But I am extremely surprised that the editors of the San Francisco Chronicle, whose job is to filter out the nutcases, somehow let this one through and printed it on the front page of the C section on Sunday. Shame on them.

The subprime mess that has been much in the news recently has many fathers, from Congress bullying lenders to expand lending to low income borrowers (which has now been renamed “predatory lending”) to lax regulatory oversight of the mortgage brokering business, securitization excesses on the back end, and lastly, a broadly flawed mortgage services business.

On this last point I would simply ask if you have had your home refinanced in recent years. Home appraisers may take their jobs very seriously but the fact remains that they have an incentive to maximize valuation of properties in order to preserve relationships with their true customers, mortgage brokers. Also, there is self-reinforcing aspect of this process breakdown when appraisers use comparative valuations as the basis for the target valuation.

Over the past few years, the housing market became riddled with bogus lenders funneling mortgage money to bogus owners of houses with bogus prices. Attempting to prop up this phony baloney is a pointless exercise. What the housing market needs in order to get back to normal is a strong dose of reality. [From TCS Daily - Your Income and Your House]

At the end of the day there is but one group in this whole mess that bears ultimate responsibility, borrowers. The facts are simply do not support the victimization theme that some are throwing around, namely that 85% of refinances were for more money than the loan they were replacing and borrowing more money that one can afford the maintenance on is not something the loan industry or government should be protecting borrowers from.

With 20% of the Bay Area foreclosures being held by speculators who often put zero money down on these properties, it’s increasingly clear that the mortgage industry crisis is less about borrowers being hoodwinked by lenders and more about borrowers taking great advantage of the prevailing lending climate. As such, it’s best to let the marketplace deal with this, but if the government really feels the need to get involved, a good place to start would be the appraisal and inspection process and the title process. Streamlining both of those segments of the real estate industry would do more to reduce fees, improve quality, and build stability in the market than any relief for subprime borrowers.

Lastly, for a rather humorous look, in facetious too-close-to-true kind of way, check out Iowahawk’s take on the American dream.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Daily ETF Trend Report – Fix Income
Mailbag: How to Know if You’re Rich
Read more on Chronicle, Income at Wikinvest

Do As I Say, Not As I Do. Part 1324.6

NYTime columnist Tom Friedman has certainly recast himself as voice and conscience of climate change while in Bali over the last couple of weeks; I wonder how this sits with his 11,000 square foot living accommodations. One more time, when the people who are telling me this is a crisis start ACTING like it’s a crisis, then I will too.

The property is listed on the tax rolls for [well over $9,000,000]. It makes me feel better that those who preach environmentalism practice such a modest intrusion on the environment itself. [From Power Line: Notes on Tom Friedman's carbon footprint]