<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile to Customers : FU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan&#039;s take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Marman</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/comment-page-1/#comment-203253</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Marman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/#comment-203253</guid>
		<description>Yeah, as Zoli said, this definitely does not make sense - I don&#039;t understand why they would consider blocking when it would only lead to additional revenue for them.

Biz Stone said it was a technical issue, and I tend to believe him. http://blog.twitter.com/2007/12/t-mobile-mix-up-was-technical.html

&quot;T-Mobile does not have a policy against Twitter—in fact, they like us. This was a technical bug, now resolved.&quot;

That said, I&#039;d have to read my terms of service (which I&#039;m not about to do, since it&#039;s just a technical issue right?), but I have to wonder if T-Mo would somehow be in violation if they charge me for a text message and never deliver it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, as Zoli said, this definitely does not make sense &#8211; I don&#8217;t understand why they would consider blocking when it would only lead to additional revenue for them.</p>
<p>Biz Stone said it was a technical issue, and I tend to believe him. <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2007/12/t-mobile-mix-up-was-technical.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.twitter.com/2007/12/t-mobile-mix-up-was-technical.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;T-Mobile does not have a policy against Twitter—in fact, they like us. This was a technical bug, now resolved.&#8221;</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d have to read my terms of service (which I&#8217;m not about to do, since it&#8217;s just a technical issue right?), but I have to wonder if T-Mo would somehow be in violation if they charge me for a text message and never deliver it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/comment-page-1/#comment-202414</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/#comment-202414</guid>
		<description>Interestingly in this case they are also F themselves. Twitter usage would lead to increased SMS usage, which is revenue for T-Mobile. Cutting off a revenue source?  Crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly in this case they are also F themselves. Twitter usage would lead to increased SMS usage, which is revenue for T-Mobile. Cutting off a revenue source?  Crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/comment-page-1/#comment-202406</link>
		<dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/12/15/t-mobile-to-customers-fu/#comment-202406</guid>
		<description>telcos are also blocking other services...I asked earlier in week if Verizon&#039;s planned &quot;open&quot; option next year - &quot;any apps, any devices&quot; would also include &quot;any services&quot;

http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/a-service-is-di.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>telcos are also blocking other services&#8230;I asked earlier in week if Verizon&#8217;s planned &#8220;open&#8221; option next year &#8211; &#8220;any apps, any devices&#8221; would also include &#8220;any services&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/a-service-is-di.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/a-service-is-di.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

