<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Vista or Not To Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan&#039;s take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: racing post casino online</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-283225</link>
		<dc:creator>racing post casino online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-283225</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;racing post casino online...&lt;/strong&gt;

eddies stabilizes river ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>racing post casino online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>eddies stabilizes river &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason M. Lemkin</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Lemkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174964</guid>
		<description>I would def go with XP.  My lesson from Parallels is that XP actually is a pretty snappy OS if you can get it without all the crapware that runs on a stnd windows PC.  I actually have XP configured to run on my Mac/Parellels with only 600mb or so of memory and it&#039;s far snappier than the 2gb PC I have at work loaded with crapware.  Parallels is a memory hog so unless you have 3gb on your MacBook I would stick with XP and it will likely be the fastest XP you&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would def go with XP.  My lesson from Parallels is that XP actually is a pretty snappy OS if you can get it without all the crapware that runs on a stnd windows PC.  I actually have XP configured to run on my Mac/Parellels with only 600mb or so of memory and it&#8217;s far snappier than the 2gb PC I have at work loaded with crapware.  Parallels is a memory hog so unless you have 3gb on your MacBook I would stick with XP and it will likely be the fastest XP you&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174961</guid>
		<description>It must be disappointing to be part of the Vista team at MS and after having spent 5 years building it people still don&#039;t find it that much different than the version it replaced. I think I&#039;ll go with XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be disappointing to be part of the Vista team at MS and after having spent 5 years building it people still don&#8217;t find it that much different than the version it replaced. I think I&#8217;ll go with XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Harris</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174949</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174949</guid>
		<description>I have Vista on my tablet and haven&#039;t had any big issues... but I installed so I could have a development environment with it.  Otherwise I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any compelling reason to switch from XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Vista on my tablet and haven&#8217;t had any big issues&#8230; but I installed so I could have a development environment with it.  Otherwise I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any compelling reason to switch from XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac, Parallels and Vista or XP at Train Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174810</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac, Parallels and Vista or XP at Train Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174810</guid>
		<description>[...] on installing Vista on my Mac tonight.  Looks like Jeff Nolan is thinking the same question.  Vista or XP with Parallels.  Most people that have tried Vista say stay with XP, but I have a copy of Vista and am thinking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on installing Vista on my Mac tonight.  Looks like Jeff Nolan is thinking the same question.  Vista or XP with Parallels.  Most people that have tried Vista say stay with XP, but I have a copy of Vista and am thinking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fewquid</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174796</link>
		<dc:creator>fewquid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174796</guid>
		<description>Last I heard, certain apps like Photoshop still have Vista issues.  I actually bought my MacBook because I needed an XP machine in a hurry and I couldn&#039;t find a local PC vendor that could sell me an XP laptop.  It&#039;s worked like a champ with Parallels -- no complaints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I heard, certain apps like Photoshop still have Vista issues.  I actually bought my MacBook because I needed an XP machine in a hurry and I couldn&#8217;t find a local PC vendor that could sell me an XP laptop.  It&#8217;s worked like a champ with Parallels &#8212; no complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-174793</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 03:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/10/03/to-vista-or-not-to-vista/#comment-174793</guid>
		<description>IIRC there was some chatter awhile ago about what versions of Vista MS would allow to run virtualized.  Can&#039;t remember if it was FUD but you might check it out before you commit to Vista.

I&#039;m running Fusion/XPSP2 on my new iMac and have been very happy with it... especially the Unity function that Fusion has.  It bogs some with 1gb RAM (not unusable, but perceptible), but screams with 2gb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC there was some chatter awhile ago about what versions of Vista MS would allow to run virtualized.  Can&#8217;t remember if it was FUD but you might check it out before you commit to Vista.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running Fusion/XPSP2 on my new iMac and have been very happy with it&#8230; especially the Unity function that Fusion has.  It bogs some with 1gb RAM (not unusable, but perceptible), but screams with 2gb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

