Comments on: Corporate Doublespeak http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/07/26/corporate-doublespeak/ Jeff Nolan's take on innovation, entrepreneurship, tech and stuff that interests me Thu, 17 May 2012 21:05:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Matt http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/07/26/corporate-doublespeak/comment-page-1/#comment-149166 Matt Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:39:22 +0000 http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/07/26/corporate-doublespeak/#comment-149166 Agreed. Much of it seems ridiculous to me. Why is the term "leveraged" preferred to "used", for example? I believe that developments such as blogging (internal and public) and social networking will help change that. Certainly I aim to communicate in a language that is understood by most people in the business blog that I maintain. Agreed. Much of it seems ridiculous to me. Why is the term “leveraged” preferred to “used”, for example? I believe that developments such as blogging (internal and public) and social networking will help change that. Certainly I aim to communicate in a language that is understood by most people in the business blog that I maintain.

]]> By: Dennis Howlett http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/07/26/corporate-doublespeak/comment-page-1/#comment-148955 Dennis Howlett Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:15:59 +0000 http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/07/26/corporate-doublespeak/#comment-148955 Here's one for you Jeff: Situational ethics = lies Here’s one for you Jeff:

Situational ethics = lies

]]>