<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McNealy Spends Retirement Pitching Curriki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan&#039;s take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/comment-page-1/#comment-104313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/#comment-104313</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Donâ€™t you think that crowdsourced educational content, like Curriki, could diminish the influence that textbook publishers have in the market? The precedent for his is what happened to reference book publishers in a world with wikipedia. While I have issues with the authority qualification that wikipedia employs, but the overall quality of the resource remains very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Donâ€™t you think that crowdsourced educational content, like Curriki, could diminish the influence that textbook publishers have in the market? The precedent for his is what happened to reference book publishers in a world with wikipedia. While I have issues with the authority qualification that wikipedia employs, but the overall quality of the resource remains very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/comment-page-1/#comment-104310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/02/13/mcnealy-spends-retirement-pitching-curriki/#comment-104310</guid>
		<description>Scott McNealy has a good heart, and he certainly is a technological whiz.  But he misunderstands teachers.  

I have serious doubts whether McNealy&#039;s vision will become a reality because teachers have neither the time nor inclination nor expertise to make use of this site.  McNealy&#039;s vision assumes that the problem in education is access to the &quot;quantity&quot; of resources out there. 

My view is that teachers need help identifying quality.  So many resources written by teachers are just plain garbage.  Meanwhile, there are many absolutely astounding resources developed by experts, foundations, universities, and myriad other organizations that go unused--because no one can find the darned things.  Often the agencies that produce these high quality resources lack the marketing muscle to compete with Pearson and McGraw-Hill.  

I wish McNealy would focus his energy on solving the real problems in the market for instructionalm materials.  His vision at this poing misses the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott McNealy has a good heart, and he certainly is a technological whiz.  But he misunderstands teachers.  </p>
<p>I have serious doubts whether McNealy&#8217;s vision will become a reality because teachers have neither the time nor inclination nor expertise to make use of this site.  McNealy&#8217;s vision assumes that the problem in education is access to the &#8220;quantity&#8221; of resources out there. </p>
<p>My view is that teachers need help identifying quality.  So many resources written by teachers are just plain garbage.  Meanwhile, there are many absolutely astounding resources developed by experts, foundations, universities, and myriad other organizations that go unused&#8211;because no one can find the darned things.  Often the agencies that produce these high quality resources lack the marketing muscle to compete with Pearson and McGraw-Hill.  </p>
<p>I wish McNealy would focus his energy on solving the real problems in the market for instructionalm materials.  His vision at this poing misses the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

