<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T offers too slow naked DSL for too much</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:20:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telecoms: California Declares Free Market Broken &#124; Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-289729</link>
		<dc:creator>Telecoms: California Declares Free Market Broken &#124; Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-289729</guid>
		<description>[...] huh, the California PUC is suggesting that you can&#8217;t have a competitive market without competition. Why didn&#8217;t I think of that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] huh, the California PUC is suggesting that you can&#8217;t have a competitive market without competition. Why didn&#8217;t I think of that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samuel123;samuel1234</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-219486</link>
		<dc:creator>samuel123;samuel1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-219486</guid>
		<description>Hack again?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hack again?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-178675</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-178675</guid>
		<description>Again AT&amp;T is ripping people off.  Thats old news.  Thats why i switched to a cheap and reliable high speed internet service provider.  My DSL is off the hook and they offer many other broadband services.  Check them out: http://showmethebroadband.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again AT&amp;T is ripping people off.  Thats old news.  Thats why i switched to a cheap and reliable high speed internet service provider.  My DSL is off the hook and they offer many other broadband services.  Check them out: <a href="http://showmethebroadband.com" rel="nofollow">http://showmethebroadband.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T&#8217;s CEO Has Cahonnes : Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-152735</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T&#8217;s CEO Has Cahonnes : Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 05:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-152735</guid>
		<description>[...] First a bit of history, AT&amp;T was required by the FCC to offer naked DSL as a condition for approval of their acquisition of BellSouth. They offered naked DSL, they said, but it was just as expensive as DSL plus a phone line and the FCC smacked them down. The boys at Ma Bell were not deterred, they then offered a naked DSL that was cheap, but also really really slow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First a bit of history, AT&amp;T was required by the FCC to offer naked DSL as a condition for approval of their acquisition of BellSouth. They offered naked DSL, they said, but it was just as expensive as DSL plus a phone line and the FCC smacked them down. The boys at Ma Bell were not deterred, they then offered a naked DSL that was cheap, but also really really slow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-88745</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-88745</guid>
		<description>I agreee, AT&amp;T&#039;s effort to attract consumers with a $20 monthly DSL service has only been their downfall as the price for their services don&#039;t compare to the quality of their services.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://nationwide-dsl.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nationwide DSL&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreee, AT&amp;T&#8217;s effort to attract consumers with a $20 monthly DSL service has only been their downfall as the price for their services don&#8217;t compare to the quality of their services.</p>
<p><a href="http://nationwide-dsl.com" rel="nofollow">Nationwide DSL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-69003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-69003</guid>
		<description>I keep getting calls from Comcast wanting to sell me VOIP for $30+ a month... I asked the guy &quot;I get Vonage for $24 a month, why would I spend $30 for the same thing from you?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep getting calls from Comcast wanting to sell me VOIP for $30+ a month&#8230; I asked the guy &#8220;I get Vonage for $24 a month, why would I spend $30 for the same thing from you?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: its4us2think</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/comment-page-1/#comment-68020</link>
		<dc:creator>its4us2think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2007/01/16/att-offers-too-slow-naked-dsl-for-too-much/#comment-68020</guid>
		<description>Bingo! my feelings exactly. 

What consumer benefits? They just increased the phone feature pricing (now caller ID costs $8, can you believe it? Just this pricing on CallerID is a standing proof that how monopolies are squeezing us).  I disconnected my DSL as I got a cable modem connection, operator was saying that there is a great offer to get unlimited long distance and bundled phone features for just $50. I was asking her &quot;Isn&#039;t it double the VOIP phones, which offer the same features&quot;. She was telling that she does not know the pricing of VOIP and then she said you still need the internet. Duh! of course I need internet, I need internet more than the land line.

As you have mentioned only hope is the WiMax or similar technologies. Otherwise these monopolies who own the &quot;last mile&quot; are going to merry on us with their mergers and acquisitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo! my feelings exactly. </p>
<p>What consumer benefits? They just increased the phone feature pricing (now caller ID costs $8, can you believe it? Just this pricing on CallerID is a standing proof that how monopolies are squeezing us).  I disconnected my DSL as I got a cable modem connection, operator was saying that there is a great offer to get unlimited long distance and bundled phone features for just $50. I was asking her &#8220;Isn&#8217;t it double the VOIP phones, which offer the same features&#8221;. She was telling that she does not know the pricing of VOIP and then she said you still need the internet. Duh! of course I need internet, I need internet more than the land line.</p>
<p>As you have mentioned only hope is the WiMax or similar technologies. Otherwise these monopolies who own the &#8220;last mile&#8221; are going to merry on us with their mergers and acquisitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
