<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The power of networks, part 1382.2c</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan&#039;s take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/comment-page-1/#comment-14925</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/#comment-14925</guid>
		<description>[...] Timely article in the Merc considering that I wrote about reputation just today. I always find it curious that people look at Ebay&#8217;s reputation system as a model, or refer to it as sophisticated. Insofar as a true reputation system it has to be absolutely primitive because it puts far too much power in the hands of those reviewing the seller, and fails to provide any dispute resolution process. A few years back I sold something on Ebay and the woman that bought it clearly didn&#8217;t understand what she was buying because when she received the item in question she flamed me in the feedback. But I was essentially powerless to do anything about it, aside from enter a comment in response to her feedback&#8230; but that&#8217;s about as effective as getting a newspaper correction on page D36. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Timely article in the Merc considering that I wrote about reputation just today. I always find it curious that people look at Ebay&#8217;s reputation system as a model, or refer to it as sophisticated. Insofar as a true reputation system it has to be absolutely primitive because it puts far too much power in the hands of those reviewing the seller, and fails to provide any dispute resolution process. A few years back I sold something on Ebay and the woman that bought it clearly didn&#8217;t understand what she was buying because when she received the item in question she flamed me in the feedback. But I was essentially powerless to do anything about it, aside from enter a comment in response to her feedback&#8230; but that&#8217;s about as effective as getting a newspaper correction on page D36. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Old Network &#187; Your network will act quickly and it will remember</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/comment-page-1/#comment-14695</link>
		<dc:creator>This Old Network &#187; Your network will act quickly and it will remember</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/#comment-14695</guid>
		<description>[...] More noise for a distributed, contextual-based reputation system by Jeff Nolan&#8230; Two seemingly unconnected events caught my attention over the last week and it was only this morning that I put them together. The first is the now well covered Photoâ€™chopped photos that Reuters carried and then retracted, and the second was the less known case of Kevin Corazza v. Kris Krug. [on Flickr] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More noise for a distributed, contextual-based reputation system by Jeff Nolan&#8230; Two seemingly unconnected events caught my attention over the last week and it was only this morning that I put them together. The first is the now well covered Photoâ€™chopped photos that Reuters carried and then retracted, and the second was the less known case of Kevin Corazza v. Kris Krug. [on Flickr] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Improved Plan Resonate &#187; Formal and Informal Reputation Systems</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/comment-page-1/#comment-14640</link>
		<dc:creator>New Improved Plan Resonate &#187; Formal and Informal Reputation Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/08/08/the-power-of-networks-part-13822c/#comment-14640</guid>
		<description>[...] Today SAP strategist Jeff Nolan presented us with this: &#8220;My prediction is that reputation systems of all kinds will increasingly become a focus for anything in the public view, and they will rely on techniques that capture the power of community to derive trust rather than a brand manufacturing it.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today SAP strategist Jeff Nolan presented us with this: &#8220;My prediction is that reputation systems of all kinds will increasingly become a focus for anything in the public view, and they will rely on techniques that capture the power of community to derive trust rather than a brand manufacturing it.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

