<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Pillars: Does Social Software help Enterprises Dumb Down?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:48:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indus</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/comment-page-1/#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator>Indus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/#comment-8496</guid>
		<description>The only way to get rid of the &quot;static-ness&quot; of corporate intranets is by adopting tools for bottoms-up/grassroots collaboration. Most decision makers do not understand the difference between blogs and wikis and the likes. Given the easy DIY nature of MediaWiki, WordPress, Movable Type,.etc. most of it can be up and running with little or no-IT help.  This would lead to the intranet of the future -- The Writable Intranet. Writable Intranet where employees collaborate using Wikis, Blogs and applications interoperate using RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to get rid of the &#8220;static-ness&#8221; of corporate intranets is by adopting tools for bottoms-up/grassroots collaboration. Most decision makers do not understand the difference between blogs and wikis and the likes. Given the easy DIY nature of MediaWiki, WordPress, Movable Type,.etc. most of it can be up and running with little or no-IT help.  This would lead to the intranet of the future &#8212; The Writable Intranet. Writable Intranet where employees collaborate using Wikis, Blogs and applications interoperate using RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused Of Calcutta &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Four Pillars: On enterprises and complexity bias</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/comment-page-1/#comment-8052</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused Of Calcutta &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Four Pillars: On enterprises and complexity bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/07/07/four-pillars-does-social-software-help-enterprises-dumb-down/#comment-8052</guid>
		<description>[...] The kernel for this post was a comment made by Jeff Nolan (Hi Jeff!) on apparent complexity biases in enterprise software selection/development, and a follow-up by Jeff Weinberger, both relating to one of my recent posts. And before I commented further, I felt it was appropriate to link back to an earlier post of mine that new readers may not have seen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The kernel for this post was a comment made by Jeff Nolan (Hi Jeff!) on apparent complexity biases in enterprise software selection/development, and a follow-up by Jeff Weinberger, both relating to one of my recent posts. And before I commented further, I felt it was appropriate to link back to an earlier post of mine that new readers may not have seen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
