<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dabble DB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:50:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Venture Geek &#187; Pricing and Positioning: A Mini Case Study</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/comment-page-1/#comment-9810</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Geek &#187; Pricing and Positioning: A Mini Case Study</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/#comment-9810</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Nolan&#8217;s post about DabbleDB and how it portends the much-predicted shake-up in enterprise software (the increasingly grating &#8220;2.0&#8243; suffix is used here as &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; by too many people of late, though not by Nolan) got me thinking about pricing and targeting of the various new offerings in webland. I have looked at DabbleDB&#8217;s site a few times in the last several weeks, but I haven&#8217;t yet delved into trying it out (navigating the dizzying array of web applications hoping to take over various office features is a daunting task to say the least). But, in looking at their pricing I couldn&#8217;t help wonder what the conversations that must have gone on behind the scenes were like. DabbleDB&#8217;s pricing looks like this (looks much nicer on their site): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Nolan&#8217;s post about DabbleDB and how it portends the much-predicted shake-up in enterprise software (the increasingly grating &#8220;2.0&#8243; suffix is used here as &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; by too many people of late, though not by Nolan) got me thinking about pricing and targeting of the various new offerings in webland. I have looked at DabbleDB&#8217;s site a few times in the last several weeks, but I haven&#8217;t yet delved into trying it out (navigating the dizzying array of web applications hoping to take over various office features is a daunting task to say the least). But, in looking at their pricing I couldn&#8217;t help wonder what the conversations that must have gone on behind the scenes were like. DabbleDB&#8217;s pricing looks like this (looks much nicer on their site): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshu Sharma</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/comment-page-1/#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshu Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/#comment-5655</guid>
		<description>Jeff- You couldn&#039;t be more right. In my previous post (click my name above to read) on Disruptive Innovation I mentioned how JBoss and open-source technologies have the potential to be disruptive but may also be co-opted (again a concept introduced by Christensen). I would wager that open-source and AJAX are likely to be co-opted by big enterprise software companies. However, the subscription software (SaaS) has much greater potential for being really disruptive and not so easily adopted by existing large software vendors.

I would love to see you post more on this topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff- You couldn&#8217;t be more right. In my previous post (click my name above to read) on Disruptive Innovation I mentioned how JBoss and open-source technologies have the potential to be disruptive but may also be co-opted (again a concept introduced by Christensen). I would wager that open-source and AJAX are likely to be co-opted by big enterprise software companies. However, the subscription software (SaaS) has much greater potential for being really disruptive and not so easily adopted by existing large software vendors.</p>
<p>I would love to see you post more on this topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AccMan Pro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dabble DB - am I thick?</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/comment-page-1/#comment-5651</link>
		<dc:creator>AccMan Pro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dabble DB - am I thick?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/#comment-5651</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve posted comments o Paul Kedrosky&#8217;s site about this (he invested), TechCrunch, where Mike is effusive about the funding and Jeff Nolan, who wants to see more of this kind of app in the enterprise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve posted comments o Paul Kedrosky&#8217;s site about this (he invested), TechCrunch, where Mike is effusive about the funding and Jeff Nolan, who wants to see more of this kind of app in the enterprise. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/comment-page-1/#comment-5642</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/29/dabble-db/#comment-5642</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not impressed with progress from the closed beta. Basic calculaton functionality ain&#039;t there or is buried. I&#039;ve pinged Paul about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not impressed with progress from the closed beta. Basic calculaton functionality ain&#8217;t there or is buried. I&#8217;ve pinged Paul about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
