<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are the media revolting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan&#039;s take on innovation, entrepreneurship, tech and stuff that interests me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>Key point: &quot;...saw the reactions from SAP executives when they realized they were talking with people who intimately understood the topics at hand.&quot; Jounralists are not trained to be experts, they&#039;re trained to be interpretive listeners. It&#039;s why the Bloggerhood was never a risk. It&#039;s why certain sections of the press hate what &#039;we&#039; do.

I&#039;m sure you know but Josh has been around a very long time. Looks like he&#039;s moving from sell to buy side. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key point: &#8220;&#8230;saw the reactions from SAP executives when they realized they were talking with people who intimately understood the topics at hand.&#8221; Jounralists are not trained to be experts, they&#8217;re trained to be interpretive listeners. It&#8217;s why the Bloggerhood was never a risk. It&#8217;s why certain sections of the press hate what &#8216;we&#8217; do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you know but Josh has been around a very long time. Looks like he&#8217;s moving from sell to buy side. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grier Graham</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Grier Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/06/01/are-the-media-revolting/#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>As a former member of  &quot;old media&quot; and a participant in the era of new media, I have to agree with you and take issue with Andy&#039;s view which is akin to &quot;the world is flat.&quot;

You can&#039;t look any media outlet and believe that it somehow infalliable and that its annointed experts are always guaranteed to be truthful, accurate and objective. That&#039;s just not the way the business works and it never has worked that way.

Journalists and bloggers can be thought of as lenses which are subjective, not objective. The good ones are able to tightly focus in on a story or an issue and offer a valuable and unique perspective or view to the reader.

Bloggers and blogging add a powerful new tool to the information mix. The thing that I love about your Sapphire experiment  is that you&#039;ve given people the opportunity to see an event such as this through 10 unique lenses instead of just one. Very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former member of  &#8220;old media&#8221; and a participant in the era of new media, I have to agree with you and take issue with Andy&#8217;s view which is akin to &#8220;the world is flat.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t look any media outlet and believe that it somehow infalliable and that its annointed experts are always guaranteed to be truthful, accurate and objective. That&#8217;s just not the way the business works and it never has worked that way.</p>
<p>Journalists and bloggers can be thought of as lenses which are subjective, not objective. The good ones are able to tightly focus in on a story or an issue and offer a valuable and unique perspective or view to the reader.</p>
<p>Bloggers and blogging add a powerful new tool to the information mix. The thing that I love about your Sapphire experiment  is that you&#8217;ve given people the opportunity to see an event such as this through 10 unique lenses instead of just one. Very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

