<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Major User Revolt on YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:50:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Best of eBay Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 Community Management</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of eBay Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 Community Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 07:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Nolan  alerted me to user revolts at youTube over heavy handed management of its community. Miel, a power user of YouTube has &#8220;quit&#8221; youTube. In his own words.  Okay. Iâ€™m out of YouTube. I refuse to use the service any longer. Recent changes made it very obvious they donâ€™t want users with large archives. The site is very very slow and I have over 30 pages of videos. Browsing to page 28 took me exactly 12 minutes, whereas before the interface update I could just click the page I wanted to see. Turns out a few of my uploaded videos were rejected due to inappropriate content, which I totally donâ€™t get, because nobody got killed, no nudity was shown and no dirty language was in it. It didnâ€™t feature any stolen music and I didnâ€™t sing. Then why is it inappropriate? Because some puritan mind flagged the movie in the hopes it would make the world a better place? Well Iâ€™ve had it with these random rejections. I donâ€™t take it anymore. There is totally no way to defend you against this, you get no warning at all if a clip has been flagged, you just have to come to the conclusion whilst browsing your video archive. This particular clip was uploaded in September last year. Itâ€™s been on there for months, and all of the sudden the content isnâ€™t appropriate anymore? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Nolan  alerted me to user revolts at youTube over heavy handed management of its community. Miel, a power user of YouTube has &#8220;quit&#8221; youTube. In his own words.  Okay. Iâ€™m out of YouTube. I refuse to use the service any longer. Recent changes made it very obvious they donâ€™t want users with large archives. The site is very very slow and I have over 30 pages of videos. Browsing to page 28 took me exactly 12 minutes, whereas before the interface update I could just click the page I wanted to see. Turns out a few of my uploaded videos were rejected due to inappropriate content, which I totally donâ€™t get, because nobody got killed, no nudity was shown and no dirty language was in it. It didnâ€™t feature any stolen music and I didnâ€™t sing. Then why is it inappropriate? Because some puritan mind flagged the movie in the hopes it would make the world a better place? Well Iâ€™ve had it with these random rejections. I donâ€™t take it anymore. There is totally no way to defend you against this, you get no warning at all if a clip has been flagged, you just have to come to the conclusion whilst browsing your video archive. This particular clip was uploaded in September last year. Itâ€™s been on there for months, and all of the sudden the content isnâ€™t appropriate anymore? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to 650 :: Web 2.0 Community Management :: May :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitchhiker&#8217;s Guide to 650 :: Web 2.0 Community Management :: May :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/05/03/major-user-revolt-on-youtube/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Nolan  alerted me to user revolts at youTube over heavy handed management of its community. Miel, a power user of YouTube has &#8220;quit&#8221; youTube. In his own words.  Okay. Iâ€™m out of YouTube. I refuse to use the service any longer. Recent changes made it very obvious they donâ€™t want users with large archives. The site is very very slow and I have over 30 pages of videos. Browsing to page 28 took me exactly 12 minutes, whereas before the interface update I could just click the page I wanted to see. Turns out a few of my uploaded videos were rejected due to inappropriate content, which I totally donâ€™t get, because nobody got killed, no nudity was shown and no dirty language was in it. It didnâ€™t feature any stolen music and I didnâ€™t sing. Then why is it inappropriate? Because some puritan mind flagged the movie in the hopes it would make the world a better place? Well Iâ€™ve had it with these random rejections. I donâ€™t take it anymore. There is totally no way to defend you against this, you get no warning at all if a clip has been flagged, you just have to come to the conclusion whilst browsing your video archive. This particular clip was uploaded in September last year. Itâ€™s been on there for months, and all of the sudden the content isnâ€™t appropriate anymore? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Nolan  alerted me to user revolts at youTube over heavy handed management of its community. Miel, a power user of YouTube has &#8220;quit&#8221; youTube. In his own words.  Okay. Iâ€™m out of YouTube. I refuse to use the service any longer. Recent changes made it very obvious they donâ€™t want users with large archives. The site is very very slow and I have over 30 pages of videos. Browsing to page 28 took me exactly 12 minutes, whereas before the interface update I could just click the page I wanted to see. Turns out a few of my uploaded videos were rejected due to inappropriate content, which I totally donâ€™t get, because nobody got killed, no nudity was shown and no dirty language was in it. It didnâ€™t feature any stolen music and I didnâ€™t sing. Then why is it inappropriate? Because some puritan mind flagged the movie in the hopes it would make the world a better place? Well Iâ€™ve had it with these random rejections. I donâ€™t take it anymore. There is totally no way to defend you against this, you get no warning at all if a clip has been flagged, you just have to come to the conclusion whilst browsing your video archive. This particular clip was uploaded in September last year. Itâ€™s been on there for months, and all of the sudden the content isnâ€™t appropriate anymore? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
