<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persistent Search: Searchâ€™s Next Big Battleground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/</link>
	<description>Jeff Nolan's take on investment, innovation, entrepreneurship and the technology industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:20:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lalit Sarna</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Lalit Sarna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Jeff,
Persistance Vs prospective search debate is beginning to heat up. A few companies such as PubSub are innovating in that space. However I see lack of innovation in the space of relevance of search. There are plenty of technologies that help rank the results based on popularity in generic categories. However relevance should be a measure of both relevance of the content and the relevance of the author to the individual consumer.  Once relevance is established filtering mechanism based on reputation of the author and content can be used to devise ranking systems personalized to a users need. Further more in the fragmented space of multiple devices that enable access to information of multiple channels, information needs to be customized to meet the UI limitations of devices. 

As I mentioned during our brief conversation at the TIE Web 2.0 for the enterprise event ( Indian guy with long hair ), at ConnectedMix we are building upon the innovations of the likes of PubSub, Myspace, 4Info and developing reputation enabled community aided vertical search approach to tackle this issue.  Interest based communities narrow down the relevance of the content created by like minded people. Open reputation for content and author creates filtering mechanism. Personalized access to data customized for your medium of choice help address the UI challenges. I would love to connect with you and get your feed back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,<br />
Persistance Vs prospective search debate is beginning to heat up. A few companies such as PubSub are innovating in that space. However I see lack of innovation in the space of relevance of search. There are plenty of technologies that help rank the results based on popularity in generic categories. However relevance should be a measure of both relevance of the content and the relevance of the author to the individual consumer.  Once relevance is established filtering mechanism based on reputation of the author and content can be used to devise ranking systems personalized to a users need. Further more in the fragmented space of multiple devices that enable access to information of multiple channels, information needs to be customized to meet the UI limitations of devices. </p>
<p>As I mentioned during our brief conversation at the TIE Web 2.0 for the enterprise event ( Indian guy with long hair ), at ConnectedMix we are building upon the innovations of the likes of PubSub, Myspace, 4Info and developing reputation enabled community aided vertical search approach to tackle this issue.  Interest based communities narrow down the relevance of the content created by like minded people. Open reputation for content and author creates filtering mechanism. Personalized access to data customized for your medium of choice help address the UI challenges. I would love to connect with you and get your feed back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Feed Is Born &#187; Info overload - RSS, Webfeeds and Information Overload!</title>
		<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>A Feed Is Born &#187; Info overload - RSS, Webfeeds and Information Overload!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2006/04/11/persistent-search-search%e2%80%99s-next-big-battleground/#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
